Trump rejected Israel's plan to attack Khamenei: what is behind the political lines?
At a time of heightened tension in the Middle East, U.S. President Donald Trump vetoed Israel's plan to carry out an attack on Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Reuters agency reported on June 15, Sunday, citing official sources that the Trump administration announced a firm position on this matter.
According to the information, a senior U.S. government official commented to journalists: “Did the Iranians kill one American? No. Until they do that, the idea of eliminating anyone from the (Iranian) political leadership is not even on the table.” These words are of great significance for Washington in terms of establishing a lively relationship and defining the limits of conflict.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also expressed his views on these reports. In an interview with American Fox News, he stated: “There are many false reports about conversations that have never happened, and I do not want to join that. What I can say is that we are doing what we need to do, and we will do what we need to do. I believe the United States knows what is good or bad for the U.S.,” he emphasized.
Another important aspect: The Wall Street Journal previously reported, citing Israeli officials, that an attack on Khamenei was “not prohibited.” That is, as long as there is a threat to Israel's security, the country has shown its readiness to take any measures to defend itself.
According to media reports, on the first day of Israel's military operations against Iran, there were reports that the country's air force had struck Khamenei's headquarters accurately. This situation once again demonstrated how serious the conflict and strategic attempts in the region have become.
In conclusion, a number of open and closed statements, declarations, and maneuvers are observed in the military-political relations between the U.S. and Israel. However, at the same time, it is becoming clear that the U.S. is prioritizing its national interests and is striving not to deepen the conflict in the region. The fate of the region is, of course, seriously influenced by every decision of the major players on the world political stage.
