The US was accused of striking the Iranian school

The strike on a school located in the Iranian city of Minab has become one of the most tragic and controversial events of the war. Zamin.uz reported on this.

International media outlets are circulating various reports about who is behind this attack. According to Reuters, the school may have been struck by US military forces.

At the same time, The New York Times noted that the attack on the school occurred simultaneously with a strike on a military facility located nearby. Official Washington has announced that an investigation is underway regarding this incident and denies accusations of intentional strikes on civilian objects.

However, the US side has not yet presented concrete evidence on this matter. On March 7, Iran struck the Al-Darfa US military base in Bahrain.

According to Tehran, it was precisely this base that may have been involved in the attack on the school in Minab. According to information released by the General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, the number of US military personnel killed and injured as a result of the strike on this base may exceed 200.

At the same time, as news of the attack on this base spread, former US President Donald Trump stated that "very strong strikes" could be delivered against Iran. Some observers link this statement to the possibility of significant losses among US military personnel.

One of the most controversial statements during the war was made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to him, he and Donald Trump are jointly fulfilling the task of "saving the world."

Interestingly, these words were spoken in a serious tone. According to observers, the situation in the world was much calmer before the start of the "world-saving operation."

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi gave an interview to one of the American TV channels. During the conversation, a journalist asked him: "US military forces could launch an attack on your country via land.

Are you not afraid of this?" Araqchi gave a sharp answer to this question: "No, on the contrary, we are waiting for them."

This statement has been evaluated by some analysts as a very firm call. While many are condemning the war, according to some observers, fighting face-to-face is a much more open and direct struggle than firing missiles from a distance.

At the same time, some analysts emphasize that it may be difficult for US troops to dare such a scenario. Because entering Iranian territory to fight is not an ordinary military operation, but a complex process associated with significant risks.

If the war had ended with just one person being killed, Iran would certainly have taken a different path, but the current situation is complex and based on multi-faceted calculations. Therefore, the international community is striving for this conflict to be resolved peacefully.