The US and Israel failed to achieve the goal of weakening the system in Iran

Three and a half months of intense military actions in the Middle East have finally ceased with the signing of a special memorandum. This was reported by Zamin.uz.

Today, most international analysts and observers are heatedly discussing the outcomes of the war. According to the main conclusions, the US and Israel were unable to fully achieve their strategic goals, while Iran, despite suffering serious losses, maintained its position on many fronts.

Why did the plans of the US and Israel fail? Washington and Tel Aviv pursued several major goals through this war.

The first and most fundamental task was to weaken the current political system in Iran, achieve a change of power by intensifying internal protests, and form a government there that aligns with Western interests. Some experts compare this plan to the Venezuela scenario, but this model did not work in Iran.

The country preserved its sovereignty. The second important goal was related to gaining control over the global oil market and global fuel prices.

In this direction as well, the allies were unable to achieve the expected results. The next pressing issue is the situation around the Strait of Hormuz, where the issue of control over strategic transport corridors continues to prompt other countries to more actively protect their own interests.

Donald Trump's "victory" and the nuclear program issue Nevertheless, it would be incorrect to say that the US emerged from the war completely empty-handed. Washington had set the limitation of Iran's nuclear program as a primary demand during negotiations held in Muscat before the war began.

In the 10th clause of the signed memorandum, it was strictly established that Iran's nuclear activities would be under the control of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). At the same time, US President Donald Trump issued a statement saying "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon again," presenting this as his great success.

It is certain that Trump will use this result as the strongest argument in domestic politics ahead of the midterm elections in November. In reality, Tehran has maintained until now that it is not seeking to create nuclear weapons.

Even the country's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa stating that possessing nuclear weapons is contrary to Islamic Sharia and is haram. Although Iran's enrichment of uranium up to 60 percent caused debates in the international community, Tehran explains this by the needs of medicine, scientific research, and atomic energy.

Iran's losses and pragmatic decision The war was very harsh and painful for Iran. More than 20,000 military strikes were carried out on the country's territory, which caused terrible damage to infrastructure, the economy, and the social sphere.

The consequences of this destruction will be felt for years to come. Most tragically, the Iranian leadership lost high-ranking military and political officials, as well as their family members.

Additionally, water, electricity, and gas supplies were completely cut off in cities, while others suffered from significant blockades and isolation. However, these difficulties strengthened the spirit of resilience and unity among the Iranian people.

The people united to preserve their culture, language, and religion. Private organizations and non-governmental organizations became active in providing aid, reaching out to isolated people, and opening centers for medical care and food supply.

The Iranian government also made a pragmatic decision during this process. When military actions stopped, internal resources were effectively directed toward economic recovery.

Programs were launched to restore damaged agriculture, repair water systems, and develop energy sources. Changes to legislation were also implemented to attract foreign investment.

This process is not fast, but it has been steady and continuous. As a result, the war was a great test for Iran, but the country preserved its independence, culture, and national unity.

This experience will serve as an important lesson for Iran in shaping its politics and economy in the coming years. The resilience of the people, the adaptability of the government, and dialogue with the international community played an important role at every step.

This situation also offers a lesson to the world: difficulties and opportunities can come together, but capability and intent are what matter. Iran's experience is a clear indicator of this.