The negotiations in Istanbul, which Putin proposed to continue, took place at the end of March 2022, just a few weeks after Russia began its large-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory.
At that time, Russia demanded that Ukraine refuse to join NATO and agree to a non-nuclear and non-aligned state status, while Ukraine was ready for this condition with security guarantees recorded in the agreements. The issue of Crimea and Donbass, annexed by Russia, was to be discussed separately at the level of the two presidents. Kyiv stated that the agreement could only be signed after a complete cessation of hostilities.
The results of the negotiations were recorded in the "Istanbul communiqué," but no specific agreements were made to develop it. In mid-June, Putin's assistant Yuri Ushakov announced that "everything was over."
At that time, a BBC source explained the reason for the failure of the negotiations as follows: "The negotiations were about documents to be signed if the leaders agreed on peace. It has now become clear that peace is completely impossible."
By this time, in particular, facts of military crimes committed by Russian servicemen in Ukraine's Bucha had already been revealed, and Russia had lost the flagship of its Black Sea fleet, the cruiser "Moskva," which complicated the negotiations despite Zelensky's statements about his readiness to continue them.
In the fall of that year, after Russia annexed four regions of Ukraine, Zelensky signed a decree effectively prohibiting direct negotiations with Putin.
Now, Putin's assistant Yuri Ushakov stated that negotiations should resume "from where they were stopped in 2022, naturally taking into account the real situation."
By the spring of 2025, discussions began again about the Istanbul communiqué potentially being a starting point for new negotiations. In particular, Donald Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, as well as Steve Witkoff, who is involved in the process of organizing negotiations regarding Ukraine, described the Istanbul negotiations as "clear and substantive" and stated that they could serve as a "framework for a peace agreement." However, Trump's special envoy for Ukraine, Kit Kellogg, disagreed with this opinion and stated that the parties now "need to develop something completely new."
Photo: Sergei Karpukhin/TASS
Similar news
Why did Russia occupy southern Ukraine so quickly?
On February 24, 2022, at 4 a.m., the Russian army began its attack on Ukrainian territory. The advance was conducted simultaneously in several directions: south, east, and north. However, it was in
Mixaylo Podolyak: "In fact, a normal and comfortable negotiation process is underway"
Hennadii Minchenko / Ukrinform / Future Publishing / Getty Images US President Donald Trump confirmed his intention to meet with Putin immediately after the inauguration on January 20, 2025. At that
The "Manchester City" club published an article about Abduqodir Husanov that has not been published anywhere else
“Manchester City” club published an article on its social media page enriched with previously unpublished information about the young footballer Abduqodir Husanov, who quickly captured the hearts of
Will Ukraine survive without American weapons?
Photo: Getty Images The extensive military aid provided to Ukraine by the US during the three years of the war may be halted. In any case, American President Donald Trump does not rule out this
What kind of life is Syria experiencing after Asad's downfall?
In December 2024, the Asad regime's fifty-year rule in Syria came to an end. Many Syrians continue to enjoy freedom, but it cannot be said that the country has achieved stability. Syria is
